Pathetic stupidity of cucks described in medieval Latin literature

Men are concerned about women’s sexual fidelity for good evolutionary reasons. Associated with that evolutionary psychology is millennia of world literature expressing men’s justified concern about being cuckolded. Medieval Latin literature, which provided men with a relatively good opportunities to express their interests and protest against gynocentric oppression, depicted cuckolds as pathetic, stupid men.

Egbert of Liège’s early-eleventh-century schoolbook for young boys provided the basics. In easily memorized Latin hexameters, Egbert drilled into boys contempt for cuckolds:

A cuckold burns devotedly for an adulterous wife. He excuses her when she’s under suspicion and forgives her stumblings in advance.

{ Zelotipam curruca suam devinctius ardet,
suspectam excusat, prior offensacula donat. } [1]

Women have long been privileged in formal criminal justice systems. Yet a man need not personally uphold such female privilege. If he doesn’t want to risk paying “child support” for children that aren’t his biological children, he must have the courage to stand up and confront his wife or girlfriend. That tends to be quite difficult for most men. Good education of boys can help them to develop into strong, courageous, no-nonsense men.

Medieval Latin literature depicted cuckolds as men so ignorant that they don’t understand the obvious. For example, a man knocked loudly at the door of a woman’s house. Imitating her husband’s stuttering voice, he called out to be admitted. Then:

The stupid husband, who was at home, hearing that voice, said to his wife, “Giovanna, open the door, Giovanna, let him in, for he seems to be me.”

{ Vir autem stolidus, domi existens, audita illius voce: “Joanna, aperi, Joanna, introduc illum,” inquit: “nam videtur idem, qui ego, esse.” } [2]

In another case, a wife named Petruccia asked her husband to buy her new shoes. Like most husband do, he fulfilled his wife’s request. But when he was out of the house and his wife saw a young man passing by, she signaled to him to come in. She went upstairs with the young man and in her haste lay down right near the stairs. That place could be seen from the doorway. Then she did what literary scholars today would regard as rape if a man did it:

Pulling the youth down upon her, embracing his buttocks with her legs and feet, she focused on the work of her desire.

{ Superimposito autem juvene, clunes ejus cruribus ac pedibus amplexa, concupito operi intendebat. } [3]

Her husband brought a friend home for lunch. The husband entered the house first:

seeing near the stairs his wife vigorously waving her feet above a young man, he said, “Hey, Petruccia! By the ass of a donkey (their favorite oath), if that’s the way you walk about, you’ll never wear out those new shoes!”

{ visaque apud scalas uxore supra juvenem pedes commovente: “Ohe! Petrucia,” inquit, “per culum asini!” (ut mos es illis jurandi) “si hoc mode ambulaveris, nunquam istos calceos consumes.” }

It’s one thing to imagine that your wife walks upon the clouds. But if your wife’s back is on the ground, another man is on top of her, and her feet are waving in the air, you should have sufficient mental functioning to suspect that you’re being cuckolded.

Being a cuckold is a miserable way to live. When she saw her husband about to enter their house, one wife hid her lover under the bed. She then accused her husband of wanting to be thrown into prison. She said that the sheriff’s officers were looking for him to imprison him for debt. Trembling with fear, the husband begged his wife for advice. She told him to climb up into their pigeon house. She would then lock the door and remove the ladder so that no one would suspect that he was there. The husband followed his wife’s advice. After he was securely locked up in the pigeon house, she brought her lover out from under the bed. The wife and her lover then pretended that the Sheriff’s officers had returned. The lover took the role of the sheriff, and the wife pretended to defend vigorously her husband. Hiding in the pigeon house, the husband shook with fear. After the wife and her lover had finished that act:

both went to bed and devoted their night to the work of Venus; meanwhile the husband was withdrawn in hiding among the pigeons and their feces.

{ ambo in lectu profecti ea nocte Veneri operam dederunt; vir delituit inter stercora et columbos. } [4]

Cuckolds spend their nights with sub-human birds. They live immersed in shit. Don’t let that happen to you.

Men must learn practical means to avoid being cuckolded. Delusions that women are naturally much less evil than men don’t help. Men must be wary of gynocentric and demonic advice. For example, in fifteenth-century Rome, Francesco Filelfo dreamed that a demon told him:

“Take this ring,” he said, “and finger it diligently on your finger. So long as it is held there, your wife will never, without your knowledge, have sex with another.”

{ “Cape hunc,” ille inquit, “annulum et diligenter in digito serva. Nam dum in eo gestaveris hunc, nunquam uxor, te inscio, cum alio concumbet. } [5]

Such technology would be even more helpful than DNA paternity testing. But Filelfo soon realized that he was in an unsustainable position:

Joyfully he awoke from sleep and perceived that he had his finger in his wife’s cunt.

{ Prae gaudio excitatus a somno, sensit se digitum habere in uxoris cunno. }

Scholars will soon better recognize that Ovid’s ring poem (Amores 2.15) is associated with the supernatural.[6] The progression from Ovid’s ring poem to the medieval Latin De pulice indicates the mundane devaluation of men’s sexuality under gynocentrism. Men cannot count on demons and the supernatural to save them from cuckolding.

In the Byzantine Empire, both physical statues and sophisticated literary romances addressed men’s risk of being cuckolded. In the highly developed societies of today, men are disparaged even for being concerned about being cuckolded. Yet men aren’t necessarily destined to be pathetic, stupid cuckolds. With study of literature, particularly medieval Latin literature, men can find enlightenment and be more sophisticated men.

*  *  *  *  *

Notes:

[1] Egbert of Liège, The Well-Laden Ship {Fecunda Ratis} 1.659-60, Latin text and English translation from Babcock (2013) pp. 72-3. Despite the soundness of this teaching, Egbert of Liège generally provided schoolboys with gynocentric lessons supporting the demonology of men’s sexuality.

[2] Poggio, Facetiae 68, “Of a stupid husband who mistook for himself a man imitating his voice {De viro stolido qui simulantem vocem credidit se ipsum esse},” Latin text from Poggoi (1879) vol. 1, pp. 110-1, with my English translation, drawing upon that of id., but tracking the Latin more closely. All the subsequent English translations are made similarly.

[3] Poggio, Facetiae 66, “What a Perugian said to his wife {Dictum Perugini ad uxorem},” Latin text from Poggoi (1879) vol. 1, pp. 107-8. The subsequent quote is from id.

[4] Poggio, Facetiae 10, “Of the woman who deceived her husband {De muliere quae virum defraudavit},” Latin text from Poggoi (1879) vol. 1, pp. 28-9.

[5] Poggio, Facetiae 133, “A vision of Francesco Filelfo {Visio Francisci Philelphi},” Latin text from Poggoi (1879) vol. 2, pp. 20-1. The subsequent quote is from id.

A similar story subsequently appears in Rabelais, Gargantua and Pantagruel 3.28 (“How Friar John comforted Panurge in the doubtful matter of cuckoldry“). This story became famous in many languages. It’s commonly known as “The Ring of Hans Carvel.”

[6] Laskaris (2018).

 

References:

Babcock, Robert Gary, ed. and trans. 2013. Egbert of Liège. The well-laden ship. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 25. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Laskaris, Julie. 2018. “Ovid’s Enchanted Ring Poem: Amores 2.15.” Paper to be presented at the 149th meeting of the Society For Classical Studies, Boston, January 4-7.

Poggio. 1879. Gian Francesco Poggio Bracciolini. The facetiae or jocose tales of Poggio, now first translated into English with the Latin text. Paris: Isidore Liseux (vol. 1, vol. 2).

Originally published at Purple Motes

Recommended Content

Leave a comment

12 thoughts on “Pathetic stupidity of cucks described in medieval Latin literature”

  1. Sorry, just can’t get over the irony of castigating cuckoldry in the same Western society which adopts the very concept as one of its centerpieces. All believing Christians are proxy cuckolds for buying the Original Lie. There is literally no way around this.

    If you go back to the beginning, the Coverture of Original Sin is a proto-form of cuckoldry.

    Yet, we are at viral fever pitch with this term being slung around, most notably by conservatives. Conservatism =/= red pill, and conservatives, particularly religious Western ones have absolutely no business using the term ‘cuckold’.

    1. The Bible explicitly advocates for male authority, but Christian conservatives have allowed the feminist entryists to completely change the church and the meaning of the Bible. This started in 1848 with the Declaration of Sentiments, one of which was “HE did not allow us to lead church.” “Love Honor Obey” became “Love Honor Cherish.” One of the ten commandments is “do not bear false witness.” There are false rape accusation stories in the Bible if I’m not mistaken.

      The problem is the Romans. Romans were the original cucks. They tainted Christianity with their “romanticism”. And then with the Enlightenment, Christians completely drank the kool-aid of egalitarianism.

      1. “Romans were the original cucks”

        I have to argue with that, it goes back a lot longer, Rome may well of been one of the first to abandon it,
        this may well be part of the reason for their rise in power.
        they did fall back into it towards the end of Rome and that may well of played a part in their colapse.
        (the early Roman Christian church being less cucked at the time was the bit that survived)

        1. Yeah, it’s possible the Ancient Greeks were cucks before Romans. Maybe the Ancient Egyptians too. Even 10th century Islamic world had cuck literature. I meant that cuckoldry as an enduring cultural force came from the last days of Rome.

          1. Rome and the Ancient Greeks are a huge part of the foundation myth of lots of cultures, so yes a lot of it can be traced back to them.

  2. Men seem to be driven by something other than their brains. The one on their shoulders doesn’t guide and temper them. In fact, whether or not a believer, Adam and Eve, the greatest and most obvious warning to men of all, was ignored.

    I can’t help but deny pity for them, except that the boys deserve better examples.

    1. The one on their shoulders evolved to deal with the ENVIRONMENT; to hunt, build, produce, invent and so on. The one between their legs makes the most important decisions. I call this reproductive desperation.

      1. More acuratly it is the one at the bottom of the skull. that primitive “fuck it, Eat it, or run the fuck away from it” reptile brain carting around its own drug lab to feed its adiction to hormones that the rational mind tries to ride like paraplegic rideing a tiger.

    2. Or -maybe, men’s brains are controlling everything. The prime directive is to procreate and a man’s brain works overtime to complete the task. The trouble may be that men have become over committed, over invested in trying to please women. Men have accommodated an entire society that attempts to please women. Every answer I can think of to reverse or change this paradigm bring up paradoxical blocks like, women are the path to children, men are always in excess, and a large number of men will rarely mate. The common man is only desired for his sacrif and his labor.

  3. It’s always wonderful when the worm turns, but unfortunately, in too many cases this never happens. “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.” – what a great moment that was.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *