Husband’s sexual obligation to wife is matter of life & death

A wife having sex with her husband when she doesn’t feel like doing it is now regarded as her husband raping her. In the more enlightened Middle Ages, the situation was much different. Christian spouses had an obligation to grant each other’s requests for sex, even if one didn’t feel like doing it.[1] The Christian marital sexual obligation was know as the marital debt. But this marital sexual obligation wasn’t merely understand in contractual-commercial terms. A medieval husband’s sexual obligation to his wife included action saving her life and preserving her mental health.

In medieval Italy, a young, newly married woman was gravely ill. She lay on her back, her eyes closed, scarcely breathing, and looking like a corpse. Everyone thought that she would soon die. The young, newly married husband despaired greatly of her mortal illness. Showing manly initiative, he rose into action:

The husband was lamenting that his wife, with whom he had been sexually intimate so few times and whom he loved greatly, was being so soon snatched away from him. He therefore decided to have sex with her before she expired. After having sent away all bystanders by mentioning vaguely the performance of some secret act, he engaged in sexual intimacy with his wife.

{ Dolebat vir tam cito eripi uxorem sibi, quam raro cognoverat, et eam, ut aequum erat, summe amabat. Decrevit ergo cum uxore, antequam ea expiraret, coire. Semotis omnibus (cum nescio quid se acturum secreto dixisset), uxorem cognovit. } [2]

The effects of marital sex were miraculous:

Immediately, as if her husband had injected new life into her body, she began to draw in breath, she opened her eyes, and after a little while she began to speak. With a gentle voice, she called for her husband.

{ Illa e vestigio, tanquam vir novam vitam in corpus ejus indidisset, coepit spiritum ducere, atque oculis subapertis, post paululum loqui, et submissa voce virum appellare. }

As most husbands do, he responded promptly and obediently to his wife’s call. She asked for some food and drink. He got them for her. She was thus fully restored to good health. The course of the wife’s illness leaves no room for doubt: without the husband’s sexual service, the wife would have died. That’s a stressful burden for husbands to hold in the marital bed.

A husband’s obligation to have sex with his wife was also regarded as vitally important to his wife’s mental health. In medieval Tuscany, a wife was suffering from frenzy and delirium. To get her to a folk-healer for a prognosis and treatment, the husband and his helpers had to transport her across the Arno River:

In order to cross the Arno River, they put the woman on the back of the strongest man. Immediately she began wriggling her buttocks, simulating sexual intercourse, and crying out in a loud voice, “I,” she said, frequently repeating her words, “want to be fucked!” Thus she voiced the cause of her illness.

{ Cum per Arnum fluvium transituri mulierem supra dorsum hominis validioris imposuissent, coepit illa vestigio nates movere, similis coeunti, ac magna vocce clamitans: “Ego,” inquit, saepius verba iterans, “vellem futui!” quibus vocibus causam expressit morbi. } [3]

Everyone laughed at the husband and attributed his wife’s illness to him:

The one who was carrying the woman poured out such a fit of laughter that he fell into the water with her. All the rest burst out laughing with knowing the cure for this insanity. They asserted that, not the work of a folk-healer, but sexual intercourse would restore her to sanity. And they turned to her husband, “You,” they said, “will be the best doctor for your wife.”

{ Qui ferebat foeminam, adeo est in resum effusus, ut una cum ea in aquam caderet. Tum ridentes omnes, cum insaniae medelam cognovissent, non esse opus incantationibus asserunt, sed coitu, ad sanitatem restituendam. Et in virium versi: “Tu,” inquiunt, “optimus uxoris curator eris.” }

All then returned home. As soon as the husband had been sexually intimate with his wife, she perfectly recovered her mind.[4] Husbands were thus held responsible for wives’ mental health. That’s a heavy burden of sexual responsibility for husbands.

Medieval wives never forgave husbands who failed to fulfill their marital sexual responsibilities. Consider a medieval husband asking his dying wife for forgiveness for any injury he might have done her. He reminded her that he had been a good husband. He explained that he had never failed to pay his marital sexual debt to her, with one exception:

excepting that time when she was not in good health, because he didn’t want to fatigue her with sexual intercourse.

{ eo excepto tempore, quo illa non recte valeret, ne coitu fatigaretur.} [5]

His wife, lying gravely ill in bed, responded:

“This,” she said, “by my faith, I can never forgive you. I was never so sick or infirm that I wasn’t able to be flat on my back.”

{ “Hoc,” inquit, “per fidem nunquam parcam neque remittam tibi: nullo enim tempore adeo invalida atque infirma extiti, quin commode possem resupina jacere.” }

Husbands must learn to infer what their wives are actually saying. To any but the dullest husband, this wife’s message to her husband is clear: get to your marital sexual work, now!

Throughout history, young, beautiful women have sexually harassed men. But within medieval marriage, sexual harassment wasn’t a concern. Spouses were expected to have sex whenever one of them desired. Husbands had the longest and hardest part of this marital responsibility. For those drooping in their duty, beatings and other forms of punishment stimulated only a small share of men with peculiar predilections. A medieval proverb offered women more generally useful wisdom:

she who would have her husband soothe her tail must pile endearments on his head. [6]

Today, men are incarcerated for not being able to make monthly payments to woman with whom they had sex. Being incarcerated greatly harms a father’s ability to provide emotional and material support to his children. Loving men, or least treating them humanely, is a much better way.

*  *  *  *  *

Notes:

[1] If both spouses never requested sex, Christians could live in a sexless marriage.

[2] Poggio, Facetiae 112, “Of a husband who was sexually intimate with his sick wife, and thus restored her to health {De viro qui uxorem aegrotam cognovit, et postea convaluit,” Latin text from Poggoi (1879) vol. 1, p. 180. Here and subsequent quotes include my English translation, drawing upon that of id., but tracking the Latin more closely. The subsequent quote is from id.

[3] Poggio, Facetiae 24, “A frenetic wife {De muliere phrenetica},” Poggoi (1879) vol. 1, pp. 50-2. The subsequent quote is from id. Cf. John the Baptist, e.g. John 1:23, “I am the voice of one crying out {ego vox clamantis}.

[4] Classical Arabic literature preserves a similar understanding of the importance of men sexually serving women:

It is said that the virgin, if she be kept too long from copulation, will suffer from a condition that the physicians call “constriction of the womb,” which leads to delirium and melancholia in the brain, to the extent that she may be thought mad, though she is not; suffice that she be fucked for the ill to vanish immediately.

Nu’aymī (2009) p. 128.

[5] Poggio, Facetiae 42, “A husband who asked his wife for forgiveness while she was sick {Vir qui mulieri dum aegrota esset veniam postulavit},” Poggoi (1879) vol. 1, pp. 74-5. The subsequent quote is from id.

[6] Gautier le Leu, “La Veuve {The Widow},” from Old French trans. Hellman & O’Gorman (1965) p. 155.

[image] A holy family in medieval Spain. Illumination from a Book of Hours. Made in Spain in the 1460s. On folio 48v in Ms. Add. 18193, British Library, London. Thanks to the Web Gallery of Art.

References:

Hellman, Robert, and Richard O’Gorman. 1965. Fabliaux; ribald tales from the old French. New York: Crowell.

Nu’aymī, Salwá (Salwa al Neimi), from Arabic trans. Carol Perkins. 2009. The proof of the honey. New York: Europa Editions.

Poggio. 1879. Gian Francesco Poggio Bracciolini. The facetiae or jocose tales of Poggio, now first translated into English with the Latin text. Paris: Isidore Liseux (vol. 1, vol. 2).

This article originally published at Purple Motes

Leave a comment

21 thoughts on “Husband’s sexual obligation to wife is matter of life & death”

  1. Men not kicking it over to women has always been a source of ridicule to the man; he’s not considered a “real man” because he can’t “get it up”.

    Women on the other hand don’t suffer any societal or social shame for being frigid or just laying there like a sack of potatoes. Apparently they think that the golden vagina is so magical that all they have to do is lay there once a week with legs wide and you are supposed to be soooooo grateful.

    The mind boggles with the entitlement.

    1. mmmm, no.
      back then she was obliged to give you services, at least lying back like a sack of potatoes, you are not supposed to feel soooo grateful.

      societal interest to your “manly” performance is largerly created by other men — med DO COMPETE who is more fertile, and they derive pride and shame from this competition.
      women also suffer from the same competition (same as an idea, but very different in implementation) a woman that can not get pregnant recieves significantly more shame than a man who can not satisfy his wife.

      the difference in focus: sexual performance for men vs. child bearing for women
      is entirely dictated by the sexual dimorphism… fertility variability among women is less, fewer options to succeed fewer options to fail, every egg counts. I am sure you get the idea why the mens’ reproductive success is being represented by the features of the copulation act itself rather than the act of giving birth.

      1. mmmm no, right back atcha.

        As you read it was also HIS duty to give it to her.

        Societal interest in a man’s performance only being perpetuated by men is absolute bullshit. Just as many women take great delight in bitching about their man’s lack of performance, or joking or ridiculing other men.

        Today it is culturally acceptable to shame and make fun of a man for both sexual dysfunction and his penis size; the public, comedy. shows, game shows, and talk show are rife with it. There is no equivalence; women DO NOT get shamed for absolutely sucking in bed and not kicking it over. Women joke around in public all the time that there husband “wanted some” but that they didn’t give it to him.

        It is absolutely taboo to shame a woman because she cannot get pregnant; this may be her own shame that she is dealing with. Overwhelmingly women receive sympathy for this and if anyone shames her, then they are considered a scumbag.

        Sorry but your female privilege is showing.

        1. > It is absolutely taboo to shame a woman because she cannot get pregnant

          I am sorry to inform you… you are an imbecile.

          1. I am sorry to inform you that you don’t have shit to back this up. You’re the moron that tried to draw an equivalence on the sexual shaming between men and women.

            Where? Where is it socially and culturally acceptable for women to be shamed and made fun of in the culture, in the media, TV shows because they cannot get pregnant? What you are claiming does not exist.

            If you can’t see that the media, entertainment industry, and politics constantly pander to and exploit women for this feel good male shaming and male bashing, then you are either blind, stupid, in denial or lying…maybe all of the above.

          2. It’s OK Robert, she was exposed the moment she couldn’t back up her argument.

            I love how these regressives try to use sciencey talk to come across as actually being a skeptic or critical thinker, and then when it comes down to it they can’t even provide evidence for their agenda driven narratives.

            Bloody hypocrites.

          3. You’ll do yourself some real damage, patting yourself on the back like that. D.I.Y. upvotes? How pathetic are you?

        1. > Your’re kidding, right?

          no, not at all. i am new to the AVFM, therefore i take the comment section VERY SERIOUSLY.

          > On what planet?

          on Earth.
          (contemporary with the anecdotes in question)

          1. “no, not at all. i am new to the AVFM, therefore i take the comment section VERY SERIOUSLY.”

            Very strange writing style, I must say – initially aspring to be e.e. cummings and then moving into block capitals. Now, let me tell you about a little thing they call the shift key…

  2. It is well known that men find pleasure in serving their loved ones, especially sexually. Generally men believe that the best way to express love is sexual intercourse. This particular belief has apparently shaped the anecdotes in question.

    Also people are known to project their own desires onto others, which fails like a prayer when we theorize a mind of a person of the opposite sex — remember, boys, 10-fold higher testosterone concentration.

    1. Exactly.

      If a wife withholds sex from her husband as a means of control then these idiots are all “Her body, her right, she doesn’t have to give you sex”. And if the man pushes for it, then these dips wads are saying “It’s abuse if a man coerces sex from his wife”. Beam me up Scotty!

      How many outright fucking examples of hypocrisy do they need before men wake the fuck up?!!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *